← Reliability

EcoSpold 1 · Calculation comparison

BAFU 2026 v1, Waste, non radioactive

A comparison of published impact results with VoLCA calculations from the same source data and the publisher’s impact factors. Points on the diagonal agree.

Engine version
volca 0.14.0 (bd7e64a, v0.14.0, linux)
Measured on
Comparison measurements and reference
DatabaseBAFU 2026 v1
Source formatEcoSpold 1
Impact method collectionEcological Scarcity 2021
Impact categoryWaste, non radioactive
UnitUBP
Activities compared11,646
Median ratio (VoLCA / published)0.9281
Comparison band1%
Activities outside the band10,600
Share outside the band91.02%
VerdictDisagrees: misses the agreement a release is held to
Points drawn2,105
Largest relative deviation-99.96%
Activity with largest deviationDisposal, hemp lime concrete
Published referenceBAFU-2026 v1 LCIA Results_corrected.xlsx
BAFU 2026 v1, Waste, non radioactive
Each point is one activity: what BAFU 2026 v1 published for Waste, non radioactive (UBP), against what VoLCA computes from the same EcoSpold 1 source under the publisher's own Ecological Scarcity 2021 factors. The black line is equality and the grey band is 1%. 11,646 activities were compared; 10,600 fall outside the band, more than a picture can hold, so 1,941 of the 11,646 are drawn, evenly spaced over the published value whichever side of the band they fall, and the 164 of the 200 farthest from equality that this walk missed are added. Where several fall on one spot, at most three markers are drawn there, since a fourth would not darken it. Median ratio 0.9281, 91.02% outside the band. This misses the agreement a release is held to: at most 5% of activities outside the band and a median ratio inside it.