← Reliability

EcoSpold 2 · Calculation comparison

ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics

A comparison of published impact results with VoLCA calculations from the same source data and the publisher’s impact factors. Points on the diagonal agree.

Engine version
volca 0.14.0 (bd7e64a, v0.14.0, linux)
Measured on
Comparison measurements and reference
Databaseecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off
Source formatEcoSpold 2
Impact method collectionEF v3.1
Impact categoryhuman toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
UnitCTUh
Activities compared19,785
Median ratio (VoLCA / published)1.0000
Comparison band1%
Activities outside the band315
Share outside the band1.59%
VerdictAgrees: meets the agreement a release is held to
Points drawn2,156
Largest relative deviation+1,576,714.95%
Activity with largest deviationamine oxide production
Published referenceecoinvent 3.9.1_cutoff_cumulative_lcia_xlsx.7z
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
Each point is one activity: what ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off published for human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics (CTUh), against what VoLCA computes from the same EcoSpold 2 source under the publisher's own EF v3.1 factors. The black line is equality and the grey band is 1%. 19,785 activities were compared; 315 fall outside the band, more than a picture can hold, so 1,979 of the 19,785 are drawn, evenly spaced over the published value whichever side of the band they fall, and the 177 of the 200 farthest from equality that this walk missed are added. Where several fall on one spot, at most three markers are drawn there, since a fourth would not darken it. Median ratio 1.0000, 1.59% outside the band. This meets the agreement a release is held to: at most 5% of activities outside the band and a median ratio inside it.