climate change / GTP 100a
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, climate change / GTP 100a Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,609 compared
Reliability
Where calculation reliability stands
VoLCA is compared with results published by database producers, using the same source data and their impact factors.
Every impact category a publisher's table holds for the method families measured here is shown, the ones that disagree included, each with the verdict a release is held to. What does not agree is on this page for the same reason as what does: so that anyone can see where the engine stands.
Choose an engine
- Engine version
volca 0.14.0 (bd7e64a, v0.14.0, linux)- Measured on
366 drawn comparisons, 67 of which miss the agreement a release is held to. Every category a publisher's table holds is drawn, whether it agrees or not, and says which. Cells cover categories recorded across measured engines, within each database and collection. Gray cells distinguish recorded refusals from measurements not recorded. Colors identify databases only.
ecoinvent
3.8 cut-off
IPCC 2013
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off · ipcc-2013
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, climate change / GTP 100a climate change / GWP 100a
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, climate change / GWP 100a Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,609 compared
climate change / GTP 20a
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, climate change / GTP 20a Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,609 compared
climate change / GWP 20a
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, climate change / GWP 20a Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,609 compared
ecological scarcity 2013
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off · ecological-scarcity-2013
carcinogenic substances into air
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, carcinogenic substances into air Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,306 compared
energy resources
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, energy resources Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,281 compared
global warming
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, global warming Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,608 compared
heavy metals into air
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, heavy metals into air Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,372 compared
heavy metals into soil
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, heavy metals into soil Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,279 compared
heavy metals into water
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, heavy metals into water Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,282 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, land use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,507 compared
main air pollutants and PM
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, main air pollutants and PM Agrees
201 outside the 1% band / 18,388 compared
Largest relative deviation: +13.31%
mineral resources
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, mineral resources Agrees
262 outside the 1% band / 18,274 compared
Largest relative deviation: +950,290.67%
non radioactive waste to deposit
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, non radioactive waste to deposit Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,405 compared
ozone layer depletion
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, ozone layer depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,274 compared
pesticides into soil
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, pesticides into soil Disagrees
2,472 outside the 1% band / 18,273 compared
Largest relative deviation: -26.69%
POP into water
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, POP into water Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,275 compared
radioactive substances into air
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, radioactive substances into air Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,282 compared
radioactive substances into water
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, radioactive substances into water Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,276 compared
radioactive waste to deposit
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, radioactive waste to deposit Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,273 compared
total
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, total Agrees
229 outside the 1% band / 18,745 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,577.95%
water pollutants
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, water pollutants Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,429 compared
water resources
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off, water resources Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,299 compared
ecoinvent
3.9.1 cut-off
EF v3.1
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off · ef-v3.1
acidification
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,768 compared
climate change
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,007 compared
climate change: biogenic
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,705 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,747 compared
climate change: land use and land use change
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use and land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,916 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater Disagrees
11,529 outside the 1% band / 19,893 compared
Largest relative deviation: -91.98%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics Disagrees
12,062 outside the 1% band / 19,891 compared
Largest relative deviation: -92%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics Agrees
417 outside the 1% band / 19,783 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.96%
energy resources: non-renewable
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,679 compared
eutrophication: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, eutrophication: freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,802 compared
eutrophication: marine
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, eutrophication: marine Disagrees
7,053 outside the 1% band / 19,867 compared
Largest relative deviation: +866.27%
eutrophication: terrestrial
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, eutrophication: terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,771 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic Disagrees
18,497 outside the 1% band / 19,863 compared
Largest relative deviation: +81,168.29%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
19,172 outside the 1% band / 19,813 compared
Largest relative deviation: +4,601,148.99%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,697 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic Disagrees
1,440 outside the 1% band / 19,895 compared
Largest relative deviation: +58,748.99%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
1,414 outside the 1% band / 19,889 compared
Largest relative deviation: -48.07%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics Agrees
315 outside the 1% band / 19,785 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,576,714.95%
ionising radiation: human health
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, ionising radiation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,684 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, land use Agrees
17 outside the 1% band / 19,991 compared
Largest relative deviation: -75%
material resources: metals/minerals
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, material resources: metals/minerals Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,672 compared
ozone depletion
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,672 compared
particulate matter formation
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, particulate matter formation Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,783 compared
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, photochemical oxidant formation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,773 compared
water use
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,693 compared
IPCC 2021
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off · ipcc-2021
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,007 compared
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,007 compared
climate change / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,007 compared
climate change / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,007 compared
climate change / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,007 compared
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,705 compared
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,705 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,705 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,705 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,705 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,705 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,705 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,705 compared
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,747 compared
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,747 compared
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,747 compared
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,747 compared
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,747 compared
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,747 compared
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,747 compared
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,747 compared
climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,007 compared
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,007 compared
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,007 compared
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,916 compared
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,916 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,916 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,916 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,916 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,916 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,916 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,916 compared
ecoinvent
3.10 cut-off
EF v3.1
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off · ef-v3.1
acidification
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,754 compared
climate change
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change: biogenic
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: land use and land use change
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use and land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,883 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,881 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,769 compared
energy resources: non-renewable
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,666 compared
eutrophication: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, eutrophication: freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,796 compared
eutrophication: marine
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, eutrophication: marine Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,853 compared
eutrophication: terrestrial
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, eutrophication: terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,757 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,878 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,873 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,683 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,885 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,879 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics Agrees
43 outside the 1% band / 21,771 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6.83%
ionising radiation: human health
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, ionising radiation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,671 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, land use Agrees
16 outside the 1% band / 21,980 compared
Largest relative deviation: -75%
material resources: metals/minerals
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, material resources: metals/minerals Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,659 compared
ozone depletion
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,659 compared
particulate matter formation
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, particulate matter formation Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,769 compared
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, photochemical oxidant formation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,759 compared
water use
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
IPCC 2021
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off · ipcc-2021
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
ecoinvent
3.10.1 cut-off
EF v3.1
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off · ef-v3.1
acidification
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,754 compared
climate change
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change: biogenic
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: land use and land use change
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use and land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,883 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,881 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics Agrees
1 outside the 1% band / 21,769 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1.1%
energy resources: non-renewable
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,666 compared
eutrophication: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, eutrophication: freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,796 compared
eutrophication: marine
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, eutrophication: marine Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,853 compared
eutrophication: terrestrial
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, eutrophication: terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,757 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,878 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,873 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,683 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,885 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,879 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics Agrees
43 outside the 1% band / 21,771 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6.85%
ionising radiation: human health
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, ionising radiation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,671 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, land use Agrees
16 outside the 1% band / 21,980 compared
Largest relative deviation: -75%
material resources: metals/minerals
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, material resources: metals/minerals Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,659 compared
ozone depletion
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,659 compared
particulate matter formation
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, particulate matter formation Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,769 compared
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, photochemical oxidant formation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,759 compared
water use
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
IPCC 2021
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off · ipcc-2021
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,691 compared
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,733 compared
climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,993 compared
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 21,903 compared
ecoinvent
3.11 cut-off
EF v3.1
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off · ef-v3.1
acidification
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,392 compared
climate change: biogenic
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: biogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,329 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: fossil Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,371 compared
climate change: land use and land use change
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: land use and land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,500 compared
climate change
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,631 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,519 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,407 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,521 compared
energy resources: non-renewable
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,263 compared
eutrophication: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, eutrophication: freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,434 compared
eutrophication: marine
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, eutrophication: marine Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,491 compared
eutrophication: terrestrial
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, eutrophication: terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,395 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,511 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,311 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,516 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,517 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics Agrees
44 outside the 1% band / 23,409 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6.8%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,523 compared
ionising radiation: human health
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, ionising radiation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,268 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, land use Agrees
16 outside the 1% band / 23,586 compared
Largest relative deviation: -75%
material resources: metals/minerals
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, material resources: metals/minerals Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,255 compared
ozone depletion
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,256 compared
particulate matter formation
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, particulate matter formation Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,407 compared
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, photochemical oxidant formation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,397 compared
water use
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,319 compared
IPCC 2021
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off · ipcc-2021
climate change: aircraft emissions
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: aircraft emissions Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,255 compared
climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,329 compared
climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2, incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,329 compared
climate change: direct land use change (incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: direct land use change (incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,500 compared
climate change: direct land use change
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: direct land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,500 compared
climate change: emissions from direct land use change
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: emissions from direct land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,303 compared
climate change: fossil (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: fossil (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,371 compared
climate change: fossil emissions (excl. aircraft emissions)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: fossil emissions (excl. aircraft emissions) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,371 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: fossil Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,371 compared
climate change: removals from direct land use change
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: removals from direct land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,446 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,631 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,631 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,631 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,631 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,631 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 23,631 compared
ecoinvent
3.12 cut-off
EF v3.1
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off · ef-v3.1
acidification
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,515 compared
climate change
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,754 compared
climate change: biogenic
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: biogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,452 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: fossil Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,494 compared
climate change: land use and land use change
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: land use and land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,623 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,644 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,642 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,530 compared
energy resources: non-renewable
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,386 compared
eutrophication: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, eutrophication: freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,557 compared
eutrophication: marine
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, eutrophication: marine Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,614 compared
eutrophication: terrestrial
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, eutrophication: terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,518 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,639 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,634 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,434 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,646 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,640 compared
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics Agrees
44 outside the 1% band / 24,532 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6.81%
ionising radiation: human health
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, ionising radiation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,391 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, land use Agrees
16 outside the 1% band / 24,709 compared
Largest relative deviation: -75%
material resources: metals/minerals
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, material resources: metals/minerals Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,378 compared
ozone depletion
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,379 compared
particulate matter formation
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, particulate matter formation Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,530 compared
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, photochemical oxidant formation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,520 compared
water use
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,442 compared
IPCC 2021
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off · ipcc-2021
climate change: aircraft emissions
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: aircraft emissions Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,378 compared
climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,452 compared
climate change: direct land use change
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: direct land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,623 compared
climate change: emissions from direct land use change
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: emissions from direct land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,426 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: fossil Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,494 compared
climate change: fossil emissions (excl. aircraft emissions)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: fossil emissions (excl. aircraft emissions) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,494 compared
climate change: removals from direct land use change
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: removals from direct land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,569 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,754 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,754 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,754 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,754 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,754 compared
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,754 compared
climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2, incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,452 compared
climate change: fossil (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: fossil (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,494 compared
climate change: direct land use change (incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: direct land use change (incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 24,623 compared
Agribalyse
3.1.1
EF 3.1 adapted 1.0
Agribalyse 3.1.1 · ef31-adapted-1.0
Climate change
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Climate change Disagrees
838 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -56.58%
Ozone depletion
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Ozone depletion Disagrees
765 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -55.49%
Ionising radiation
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Ionising radiation Disagrees
205 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -59.08%
Photochemical ozone formation
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Photochemical ozone formation Disagrees
502 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -30.57%
Particulate matter
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Particulate matter Disagrees
220 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -30.49%
Human toxicity, non-cancer
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Human toxicity, non-cancer Disagrees
1,827 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -76.26%
Human toxicity, cancer
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Human toxicity, cancer Disagrees
1,616 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -47.25%
Acidification
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Acidification Disagrees
194 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -22.09%
Eutrophication, freshwater
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Eutrophication, freshwater Disagrees
676 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -65.6%
Eutrophication, marine
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Eutrophication, marine Disagrees
330 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -49.07%
Eutrophication, terrestrial
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Eutrophication, terrestrial Disagrees
205 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -28.8%
Land use
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Land use Disagrees
989 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -84.66%
Water use
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Water use Disagrees
680 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -92.15%
Resource use, fossils
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Resource use, fossils Disagrees
492 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -56.83%
Resource use, minerals and metals
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Resource use, minerals and metals Disagrees
1,292 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -68.97%
PEF
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-adapted-1.0: no category of the method answers to this name
Ecotoxicity, freshwater
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-adapted-1.0: no category of the method answers to this name
Agribalyse
3.2
EF 3.1 adapted 1.0
Agribalyse 3.2 · ef31-adapted-1.0
Climate change
Agribalyse 3.2, Climate change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Ozone depletion
Agribalyse 3.2, Ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Ionising radiation
Agribalyse 3.2, Ionising radiation Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Photochemical ozone formation
Agribalyse 3.2, Photochemical ozone formation Agrees
1 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1.41%
Particulate matter
Agribalyse 3.2, Particulate matter Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Human toxicity, non-cancer
Agribalyse 3.2, Human toxicity, non-cancer Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Human toxicity, cancer
Agribalyse 3.2, Human toxicity, cancer Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Acidification
Agribalyse 3.2, Acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Eutrophication, freshwater
Agribalyse 3.2, Eutrophication, freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Eutrophication, marine
Agribalyse 3.2, Eutrophication, marine Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Eutrophication, terrestrial
Agribalyse 3.2, Eutrophication, terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Land use
Agribalyse 3.2, Land use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Water use
Agribalyse 3.2, Water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Resource use, fossils
Agribalyse 3.2, Resource use, fossils Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Resource use, minerals and metals
Agribalyse 3.2, Resource use, minerals and metals Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
PEF
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-adapted-1.0: no category of the method answers to this name
Ecotoxicity, freshwater
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-adapted-1.0: no category of the method answers to this name
BAFU
2025 v1
IPCC 2021
BAFU 2025 v1 · ipcc-2021
GWP 100
BAFU 2025 v1, GWP 100 Disagrees
2,562 outside the 1% band / 11,558 compared
Largest relative deviation: +51,475.52%
Ecological Scarcity 2021
BAFU 2025 v1 · ecological-scarcity-2021
Water resources, evaporated
BAFU 2025 v1, Water resources, evaporated Disagrees
11,418 outside the 1% band / 11,546 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Energy resources
BAFU 2025 v1, Energy resources Disagrees
3,972 outside the 1% band / 11,579 compared
Largest relative deviation: -91.81%
Mineral resources
BAFU 2025 v1, Mineral resources Disagrees
1,612 outside the 1% band / 11,560 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.47%
Land use
BAFU 2025 v1, Land use Disagrees
11,553 outside the 1% band / 11,554 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Global warming
BAFU 2025 v1, Global warming Disagrees
2,617 outside the 1% band / 11,558 compared
Largest relative deviation: +36,089.95%
Ozone layer depletion
BAFU 2025 v1, Ozone layer depletion Disagrees
11,543 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Main air pollutants and PM
BAFU 2025 v1, Main air pollutants and PM Agrees
220 outside the 1% band / 11,565 compared
Largest relative deviation: -53.73%
Carcinogenic substances into air
BAFU 2025 v1, Carcinogenic substances into air Agrees
35 outside the 1% band / 11,551 compared
Largest relative deviation: -25.31%
Heavy metals into air
BAFU 2025 v1, Heavy metals into air Disagrees
778 outside the 1% band / 11,556 compared
Largest relative deviation: +55.07%
Water pollutants
BAFU 2025 v1, Water pollutants Disagrees
10,301 outside the 1% band / 11,557 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.87%
POP into water
BAFU 2025 v1, POP into water Disagrees
11,527 outside the 1% band / 11,547 compared
Largest relative deviation: -93.61%
Heavy metals into water
BAFU 2025 v1, Heavy metals into water Agrees
115 outside the 1% band / 11,549 compared
Largest relative deviation: +53.09%
Pesticides into soil
BAFU 2025 v1, Pesticides into soil Disagrees
4,491 outside the 1% band / 11,543 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,058,465.85%
Heavy metals into soil
BAFU 2025 v1, Heavy metals into soil Disagrees
676 outside the 1% band / 11,547 compared
Largest relative deviation: -95.33%
Radioactive substances into air
BAFU 2025 v1, Radioactive substances into air Disagrees
8,685 outside the 1% band / 11,550 compared
Largest relative deviation: +14,791.48%
Radioactive substances into water
BAFU 2025 v1, Radioactive substances into water Agrees
26 outside the 1% band / 11,549 compared
Largest relative deviation: -4.01%
Waste, non radioactive
BAFU 2025 v1, Waste, non radioactive Disagrees
10,501 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.96%
Radioactive waste to deposit
BAFU 2025 v1, Radioactive waste to deposit Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,546 compared
Total
BAFU 2025 v1, Total Disagrees
7,893 outside the 1% band / 11,616 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.95%
Noise
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
Biotic Resources
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
BAFU
2025 v2
IPCC 2021
BAFU 2025 v2 · ipcc-2021
GWP 100
BAFU 2025 v2, GWP 100 Disagrees
1,271 outside the 1% band / 11,558 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.42%
Ecological Scarcity 2021
BAFU 2025 v2 · ecological-scarcity-2021
Water resources, evaporated
BAFU 2025 v2, Water resources, evaporated Disagrees
11,418 outside the 1% band / 11,546 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Energy resources
BAFU 2025 v2, Energy resources Disagrees
3,898 outside the 1% band / 11,579 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.27%
Mineral resources
BAFU 2025 v2, Mineral resources Disagrees
1,612 outside the 1% band / 11,560 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.47%
Land use
BAFU 2025 v2, Land use Disagrees
11,553 outside the 1% band / 11,554 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Global warming
BAFU 2025 v2, Global warming Disagrees
2,620 outside the 1% band / 11,558 compared
Largest relative deviation: +36,089.75%
Ozone layer depletion
BAFU 2025 v2, Ozone layer depletion Disagrees
11,543 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Main air pollutants and PM
BAFU 2025 v2, Main air pollutants and PM Agrees
61 outside the 1% band / 11,565 compared
Largest relative deviation: -53.75%
Carcinogenic substances into air
BAFU 2025 v2, Carcinogenic substances into air Agrees
35 outside the 1% band / 11,551 compared
Largest relative deviation: -25.31%
Heavy metals into air
BAFU 2025 v2, Heavy metals into air Agrees
12 outside the 1% band / 11,556 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2.22%
Water pollutants
BAFU 2025 v2, Water pollutants Disagrees
10,301 outside the 1% band / 11,557 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.87%
POP into water
BAFU 2025 v2, POP into water Disagrees
11,527 outside the 1% band / 11,547 compared
Largest relative deviation: -93.61%
Heavy metals into water
BAFU 2025 v2, Heavy metals into water Disagrees
828 outside the 1% band / 11,549 compared
Largest relative deviation: +409.73%
Pesticides into soil
BAFU 2025 v2, Pesticides into soil Disagrees
4,490 outside the 1% band / 11,543 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,058,465.49%
Heavy metals into soil
BAFU 2025 v2, Heavy metals into soil Disagrees
676 outside the 1% band / 11,547 compared
Largest relative deviation: -95.33%
Radioactive substances into air
BAFU 2025 v2, Radioactive substances into air Disagrees
8,684 outside the 1% band / 11,550 compared
Largest relative deviation: +14,791.48%
Radioactive substances into water
BAFU 2025 v2, Radioactive substances into water Agrees
31 outside the 1% band / 11,549 compared
Largest relative deviation: -3.98%
Waste, non radioactive
BAFU 2025 v2, Waste, non radioactive Disagrees
10,501 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.96%
Radioactive waste to deposit
BAFU 2025 v2, Radioactive waste to deposit Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,546 compared
Total
BAFU 2025 v2, Total Disagrees
7,891 outside the 1% band / 11,616 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.95%
Noise
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
Biotic Resources
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
EF 3.1 adapted 1.05
BAFU 2025 v2 · ef31-1.05
Acidification
Not measured in this run
Climate change
Not measured in this run
Ecotoxicity freshwater
Not measured in this run
Eutrophication freshwater
Not measured in this run
Eutrophication marine
Not measured in this run
Eutrophication terrestrial
Not measured in this run
Human toxicity cancer
Not measured in this run
Human toxicity non-cancer
Not measured in this run
Land use
Not measured in this run
Ozone depletion
Not measured in this run
Particulate matter
Not measured in this run
Resource use fossils
Not measured in this run
Resource use minerals and metals
Not measured in this run
Water use
Not measured in this run
Ionising radiation (human health)
Not measured in this run
Photochemical ozone formation (human health)
Not measured in this run
BAFU
2026 v1
IPCC 2021
BAFU 2026 v1 · ipcc-2021
GWP 100
BAFU 2026 v1, GWP 100 Disagrees
1,271 outside the 1% band / 11,659 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.42%
Ecological Scarcity 2021
BAFU 2026 v1 · ecological-scarcity-2021
Carcinogenic substances into air
BAFU 2026 v1, Carcinogenic substances into air Agrees
35 outside the 1% band / 11,652 compared
Largest relative deviation: -25.35%
Energy resources
BAFU 2026 v1, Energy resources Disagrees
3,879 outside the 1% band / 11,677 compared
Largest relative deviation: -91.81%
Global warming
BAFU 2026 v1, Global warming Disagrees
2,753 outside the 1% band / 11,659 compared
Largest relative deviation: +36,516.49%
Heavy metals into air
BAFU 2026 v1, Heavy metals into air Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,657 compared
Heavy metals into soil
BAFU 2026 v1, Heavy metals into soil Disagrees
685 outside the 1% band / 11,648 compared
Largest relative deviation: -95.13%
Heavy metals into water
BAFU 2026 v1, Heavy metals into water Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,650 compared
Land use
BAFU 2026 v1, Land use Disagrees
11,654 outside the 1% band / 11,655 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Main air pollutants and PM
BAFU 2026 v1, Main air pollutants and PM Agrees
61 outside the 1% band / 11,666 compared
Largest relative deviation: -53.82%
Mineral resources
BAFU 2026 v1, Mineral resources Disagrees
1,480 outside the 1% band / 11,661 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.47%
Ozone layer depletion
BAFU 2026 v1, Ozone layer depletion Disagrees
11,644 outside the 1% band / 11,646 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Pesticides into soil
BAFU 2026 v1, Pesticides into soil Disagrees
4,471 outside the 1% band / 11,644 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,039,982.07%
POP into water
BAFU 2026 v1, POP into water Disagrees
11,628 outside the 1% band / 11,648 compared
Largest relative deviation: -93.56%
Radioactive substances into air
BAFU 2026 v1, Radioactive substances into air Disagrees
8,829 outside the 1% band / 11,651 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.9%
Radioactive substances into water
BAFU 2026 v1, Radioactive substances into water Agrees
73 outside the 1% band / 11,650 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.9%
Radioactive waste to deposit
BAFU 2026 v1, Radioactive waste to deposit Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,647 compared
Waste, non radioactive
BAFU 2026 v1, Waste, non radioactive Disagrees
10,600 outside the 1% band / 11,646 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.96%
Water pollutants
BAFU 2026 v1, Water pollutants Disagrees
10,407 outside the 1% band / 11,658 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.87%
Water resources, evaporated
BAFU 2026 v1, Water resources, evaporated Disagrees
11,519 outside the 1% band / 11,647 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Total
BAFU 2026 v1, Total Disagrees
7,966 outside the 1% band / 11,714 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.95%
Biotic Resources
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
Noise
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
EF 3.1 adapted 1.05
BAFU 2026 v1 · ef31-1.05
Acidification
Not measured in this run
Climate change
Not measured in this run
Climate change (biogenic)
Not measured in this run
Climate change (fossil)
Not measured in this run
Ecotoxicity freshwater
Not measured in this run
Ecotoxicity freshwater (inorganics)
Not measured in this run
Ecotoxicity freshwater (organics)
Not measured in this run
Eutrophication freshwater
Not measured in this run
Eutrophication marine
Not measured in this run
Eutrophication terrestrial
Not measured in this run
Human toxicity cancer
Not measured in this run
Human toxicity cancer (inorganics)
Not measured in this run
Human toxicity cancer (organics)
Not measured in this run
Human toxicity non-cancer
Not measured in this run
Human toxicity non-cancer (inorganics) -
Not measured in this run
Human toxicity non-cancer (organics)
Not measured in this run
Land use
Not measured in this run
Ozone depletion
Not measured in this run
Particulate matter
Not measured in this run
Resource use fossils
Not measured in this run
Resource use minerals and metals
Not measured in this run
Water use
Not measured in this run
Climate change (land use)
Not measured in this run
Ionising radiation (human health)
Not measured in this run
Photochemical ozone formation (human health)
Not measured in this run