climate change / GTP 100a
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
Reliability
Where calculation reliability stands
VoLCA is compared with results published by database producers, using the same source data and their impact factors.
Every impact category a publisher's table holds for the method families measured here is shown, the ones that disagree included, each with the verdict a release is held to. What does not agree is on this page for the same reason as what does: so that anyone can see where the engine stands.
Choose an engine
- Engine version
volca 0.13.0 (8c0396c, v0.13.0, linux)- Measured on
377 drawn comparisons, 184 of which miss the agreement a release is held to. Every category a publisher's table holds is drawn, whether it agrees or not, and says which. Cells cover categories recorded across measured engines, within each database and collection. Gray cells distinguish recorded refusals from measurements not recorded. Colors identify databases only.
ecoinvent
3.8 cut-off
IPCC 2013
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off · ipcc-2013
climate change / GWP 100a
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
climate change / GTP 20a
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
climate change / GWP 20a
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
ecological scarcity 2013
ecoinvent 3.8 cut-off · ecological-scarcity-2013
carcinogenic substances into air
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
energy resources
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
global warming
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
heavy metals into air
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
heavy metals into soil
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
heavy metals into water
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
land use
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
main air pollutants and PM
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
mineral resources
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
non radioactive waste to deposit
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
ozone layer depletion
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
pesticides into soil
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
POP into water
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
radioactive substances into air
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
radioactive substances into water
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
radioactive waste to deposit
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
total
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
water pollutants
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
water resources
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
the database is blocked by volca#311
ecoinvent
3.9.1 cut-off
EF v3.1
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off · ef-v3.1
acidification
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,180 compared
climate change
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change Disagrees
12,020 outside the 1% band / 17,161 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,586.48%
climate change: biogenic
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil Disagrees
13,157 outside the 1% band / 17,184 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,192,492.28%
climate change: land use and land use change
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use and land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,045 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater Disagrees
10,480 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
Largest relative deviation: -91.98%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics Disagrees
10,933 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
Largest relative deviation: -92%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics Agrees
418 outside the 1% band / 17,182 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.96%
energy resources: non-renewable
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,182 compared
eutrophication: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, eutrophication: freshwater Agrees
590 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,406.93%
eutrophication: marine
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, eutrophication: marine Disagrees
6,849 outside the 1% band / 17,180 compared
Largest relative deviation: +866.27%
eutrophication: terrestrial
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, eutrophication: terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,180 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic Disagrees
16,297 outside the 1% band / 17,045 compared
Largest relative deviation: +3,579.53%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
16,769 outside the 1% band / 16,941 compared
Largest relative deviation: +18,952.5%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics Agrees
1 outside the 1% band / 17,180 compared
Largest relative deviation: +92.32%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic Disagrees
2,326 outside the 1% band / 16,934 compared
Largest relative deviation: +58,749.21%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
2,380 outside the 1% band / 16,911 compared
Largest relative deviation: +819.58%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics Agrees
346 outside the 1% band / 17,168 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,576,714.95%
ionising radiation: human health
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, ionising radiation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,180 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, land use Agrees
2 outside the 1% band / 16,844 compared
Largest relative deviation: -62.5%
material resources: metals/minerals
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, material resources: metals/minerals Agrees
3 outside the 1% band / 17,179 compared
Largest relative deviation: +16.87%
ozone depletion
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
particulate matter formation
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, particulate matter formation Agrees
28 outside the 1% band / 17,180 compared
Largest relative deviation: +142.49%
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, photochemical oxidant formation: human health Disagrees
2,015 outside the 1% band / 17,182 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,333.84%
water use
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
IPCC 2021
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off · ipcc-2021
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
12,195 outside the 1% band / 17,156 compared
Largest relative deviation: +30,267.89%
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Disagrees
12,144 outside the 1% band / 17,160 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,584.58%
climate change / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
12,020 outside the 1% band / 17,161 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,586.48%
climate change / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
11,701 outside the 1% band / 17,164 compared
Largest relative deviation: +23,635.26%
climate change / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP500) Disagrees
12,228 outside the 1% band / 17,138 compared
Largest relative deviation: +23,789.45%
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,178 compared
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
13,216 outside the 1% band / 17,184 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,404,220.66%
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Disagrees
13,185 outside the 1% band / 17,184 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,340,786.27%
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
13,157 outside the 1% band / 17,184 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,192,492.28%
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
13,096 outside the 1% band / 17,184 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,821,515.28%
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500) Disagrees
13,250 outside the 1% band / 17,184 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,391,716.48%
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
13,211 outside the 1% band / 17,184 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,259,795.22%
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
13,158 outside the 1% band / 17,184 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,955,945.58%
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
13,090 outside the 1% band / 17,184 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,483,231.1%
climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
12,185 outside the 1% band / 17,157 compared
Largest relative deviation: +15,552.66%
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
12,004 outside the 1% band / 17,163 compared
Largest relative deviation: +8,943.56%
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
11,659 outside the 1% band / 17,165 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6,845.16%
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,044 compared
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,044 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,045 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,048 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,044 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,045 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,048 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,052 compared
ecoinvent
3.10 cut-off
EF v3.1
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off · ef-v3.1
acidification
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
climate change
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change Disagrees
12,331 outside the 1% band / 17,949 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,561.72%
climate change: biogenic
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil Disagrees
13,512 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,168,719.52%
climate change: land use and land use change
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use and land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,832 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater Agrees
445 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
Largest relative deviation: +73.64%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics Agrees
539 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
Largest relative deviation: +79.89%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,970 compared
energy resources: non-renewable
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,970 compared
eutrophication: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, eutrophication: freshwater Agrees
819 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,387.52%
eutrophication: marine
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, eutrophication: marine Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
eutrophication: terrestrial
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, eutrophication: terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic Agrees
216 outside the 1% band / 17,918 compared
Largest relative deviation: +33.25%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
1,548 outside the 1% band / 17,605 compared
Largest relative deviation: +746.5%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics Agrees
3 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
Largest relative deviation: +4.94%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic Disagrees
1,973 outside the 1% band / 17,632 compared
Largest relative deviation: +918.49%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
2,195 outside the 1% band / 17,608 compared
Largest relative deviation: +950.53%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics Agrees
43 outside the 1% band / 17,956 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6.83%
ionising radiation: human health
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, ionising radiation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, land use Agrees
2 outside the 1% band / 17,633 compared
Largest relative deviation: -62.5%
material resources: metals/minerals
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, material resources: metals/minerals Agrees
3 outside the 1% band / 17,967 compared
Largest relative deviation: +16.44%
ozone depletion
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
particulate matter formation
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, particulate matter formation Agrees
29 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
Largest relative deviation: +140.9%
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, photochemical oxidant formation: human health Disagrees
2,120 outside the 1% band / 17,970 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,634.58%
water use
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
IPCC 2021
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off · ipcc-2021
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
12,577 outside the 1% band / 17,940 compared
Largest relative deviation: +79,725.29%
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Disagrees
12,501 outside the 1% band / 17,947 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,580.18%
climate change / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
12,331 outside the 1% band / 17,949 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,561.72%
climate change / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
11,836 outside the 1% band / 17,952 compared
Largest relative deviation: +7,948.42%
climate change / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP500) Disagrees
12,601 outside the 1% band / 17,926 compared
Largest relative deviation: +23,784.26%
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
13,642 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,392,860.47%
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Disagrees
13,605 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,325,933.11%
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
13,512 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,168,719.52%
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
13,264 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,781,954.39%
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500) Disagrees
13,673 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,378,303.08%
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
13,637 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,249,922.72%
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
13,513 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,937,255.68%
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
13,278 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,457,214.46%
climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
12,568 outside the 1% band / 17,945 compared
Largest relative deviation: +34,325.87%
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
12,314 outside the 1% band / 17,951 compared
Largest relative deviation: +8,927.18%
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
11,768 outside the 1% band / 17,953 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6,806.69%
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,831 compared
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,831 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,832 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,834 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,831 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,832 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,834 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,839 compared
ecoinvent
3.10.1 cut-off
EF v3.1
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off · ef-v3.1
acidification
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
climate change
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change Disagrees
12,445 outside the 1% band / 17,949 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,580.39%
climate change: biogenic
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil Disagrees
13,597 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,170,347.13%
climate change: land use and land use change
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use and land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,832 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater Agrees
557 outside the 1% band / 17,965 compared
Largest relative deviation: +81.32%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics Agrees
621 outside the 1% band / 17,963 compared
Largest relative deviation: +81.94%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics Agrees
1 outside the 1% band / 17,970 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1.1%
energy resources: non-renewable
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,970 compared
eutrophication: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, eutrophication: freshwater Agrees
822 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,392.9%
eutrophication: marine
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, eutrophication: marine Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
eutrophication: terrestrial
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, eutrophication: terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic Agrees
780 outside the 1% band / 17,721 compared
Largest relative deviation: +555.09%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
1,548 outside the 1% band / 17,605 compared
Largest relative deviation: +746.77%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics Agrees
13 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
Largest relative deviation: +43.22%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic Disagrees
2,018 outside the 1% band / 17,632 compared
Largest relative deviation: +928.79%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
2,238 outside the 1% band / 17,608 compared
Largest relative deviation: +961.38%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics Agrees
43 outside the 1% band / 17,956 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6.85%
ionising radiation: human health
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, ionising radiation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, land use Agrees
2 outside the 1% band / 17,633 compared
Largest relative deviation: -62.5%
material resources: metals/minerals
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, material resources: metals/minerals Agrees
3 outside the 1% band / 17,967 compared
Largest relative deviation: +16.46%
ozone depletion
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
particulate matter formation
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, particulate matter formation Agrees
29 outside the 1% band / 17,968 compared
Largest relative deviation: +141.04%
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, photochemical oxidant formation: human health Disagrees
2,128 outside the 1% band / 17,970 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,638.04%
water use
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
IPCC 2021
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off · ipcc-2021
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
12,667 outside the 1% band / 17,940 compared
Largest relative deviation: +99,120.48%
climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Disagrees
12,594 outside the 1% band / 17,947 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,598.12%
climate change / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
12,445 outside the 1% band / 17,949 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,580.39%
climate change / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
12,041 outside the 1% band / 17,952 compared
Largest relative deviation: +7,963.05%
climate change / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change / global warming potential (GWP500) Disagrees
12,700 outside the 1% band / 17,926 compared
Largest relative deviation: +23,894.84%
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: biogenic, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,966 compared
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
13,730 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,394,669.99%
climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Disagrees
13,689 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,327,680.85%
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
13,597 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,170,347.13%
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
13,432 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,783,282.68%
climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil / global warming potential (GWP500) Disagrees
13,755 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,380,118.24%
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
13,729 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,251,523.62%
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
13,591 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,938,556.11%
climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: fossil, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
13,432 outside the 1% band / 17,972 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,458,104.95%
climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
12,664 outside the 1% band / 17,945 compared
Largest relative deviation: +37,741.62%
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
12,419 outside the 1% band / 17,951 compared
Largest relative deviation: +8,943.47%
climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
11,973 outside the 1% band / 17,953 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6,817.44%
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,831 compared
climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,831 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,832 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,834 compared
climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use / global warming potential (GWP500) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,831 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,832 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP100) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,835 compared
climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.10.1 cut-off, climate change: land use, including SLCFs / global warming potential (GWP20) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 17,840 compared
ecoinvent
3.11 cut-off
EF v3.1
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off · ef-v3.1
acidification
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,095 compared
climate change: biogenic
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: biogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,093 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: fossil Disagrees
14,316 outside the 1% band / 19,099 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,187,336.77%
climate change: land use and land use change
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: land use and land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,960 compared
climate change
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change Disagrees
13,068 outside the 1% band / 19,076 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,618.26%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics Agrees
630 outside the 1% band / 19,093 compared
Largest relative deviation: +82.72%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,097 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater Agrees
599 outside the 1% band / 19,093 compared
Largest relative deviation: +82.26%
energy resources: non-renewable
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,097 compared
eutrophication: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, eutrophication: freshwater Agrees
902 outside the 1% band / 19,093 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,525.22%
eutrophication: marine
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, eutrophication: marine Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,095 compared
eutrophication: terrestrial
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, eutrophication: terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,095 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
1,829 outside the 1% band / 18,691 compared
Largest relative deviation: +772.93%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics Agrees
14 outside the 1% band / 19,095 compared
Largest relative deviation: +43.54%
human toxicity: carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic Agrees
881 outside the 1% band / 18,830 compared
Largest relative deviation: +571.87%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
2,537 outside the 1% band / 18,702 compared
Largest relative deviation: +985.97%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics Agrees
44 outside the 1% band / 19,083 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6.8%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic Disagrees
2,312 outside the 1% band / 18,738 compared
Largest relative deviation: +953.05%
ionising radiation: human health
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, ionising radiation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,095 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, land use Agrees
2 outside the 1% band / 18,760 compared
Largest relative deviation: -62.5%
material resources: metals/minerals
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, material resources: metals/minerals Agrees
3 outside the 1% band / 19,093 compared
Largest relative deviation: +16.5%
ozone depletion
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,093 compared
particulate matter formation
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, particulate matter formation Agrees
28 outside the 1% band / 19,095 compared
Largest relative deviation: +141.42%
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, photochemical oxidant formation: human health Disagrees
2,105 outside the 1% band / 19,097 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,649.93%
water use
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,093 compared
IPCC 2021
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off · ipcc-2021
climate change: aircraft emissions
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: aircraft emissions Disagrees
19,093 outside the 1% band / 19,093 compared
Largest relative deviation: +3,900,764,763,418,344.5%
climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,093 compared
climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2, incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,093 compared
climate change: direct land use change (incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: direct land use change (incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,963 compared
climate change: direct land use change
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: direct land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 18,960 compared
climate change: emissions from direct land use change
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: emissions from direct land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 19,141 compared
climate change: fossil (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: fossil (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs) Disagrees
14,317 outside the 1% band / 19,099 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,952,169.46%
climate change: fossil emissions (excl. aircraft emissions)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: fossil emissions (excl. aircraft emissions) Disagrees
14,345 outside the 1% band / 19,099 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,187,336.78%
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: fossil Disagrees
14,316 outside the 1% band / 19,099 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,187,336.77%
climate change: removals from direct land use change
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
IPCC 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.11): nothing comparable: 25412 points at or below zero on one side
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
13,436 outside the 1% band / 19,067 compared
Largest relative deviation: +89,650.84%
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Disagrees
13,329 outside the 1% band / 19,074 compared
Largest relative deviation: +83,756.21%
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
13,068 outside the 1% band / 19,076 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,618.26%
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
12,635 outside the 1% band / 19,078 compared
Largest relative deviation: +8,098.91%
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP500) Disagrees
13,449 outside the 1% band / 19,053 compared
Largest relative deviation: +23,765.76%
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.11 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs) Disagrees
13,046 outside the 1% band / 19,078 compared
Largest relative deviation: +8,975.79%
ecoinvent
3.12 cut-off
EF v3.1
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off · ef-v3.1
acidification
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,212 compared
climate change
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change Disagrees
13,555 outside the 1% band / 20,192 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,611.05%
climate change: biogenic
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: biogenic Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,210 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: fossil Disagrees
14,825 outside the 1% band / 20,216 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,187,745.14%
climate change: land use and land use change
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: land use and land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,076 compared
ecotoxicity: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater Agrees
585 outside the 1% band / 20,210 compared
Largest relative deviation: +80.91%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, inorganics Agrees
600 outside the 1% band / 20,210 compared
Largest relative deviation: +81.51%
ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, ecotoxicity: freshwater, organics Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,214 compared
energy resources: non-renewable
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,214 compared
eutrophication: freshwater
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, eutrophication: freshwater Agrees
983 outside the 1% band / 20,210 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,534.73%
eutrophication: marine
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, eutrophication: marine Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,212 compared
eutrophication: terrestrial
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, eutrophication: terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,212 compared
human toxicity: carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic Agrees
899 outside the 1% band / 19,925 compared
Largest relative deviation: +597.12%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
2,025 outside the 1% band / 19,785 compared
Largest relative deviation: +822.5%
human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, organics Agrees
14 outside the 1% band / 20,212 compared
Largest relative deviation: +41.64%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic Disagrees
2,293 outside the 1% band / 19,837 compared
Largest relative deviation: +951.41%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, inorganics Disagrees
2,527 outside the 1% band / 19,800 compared
Largest relative deviation: +984.25%
human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, human toxicity: non-carcinogenic, organics Agrees
44 outside the 1% band / 20,216 compared
Largest relative deviation: +6.81%
ionising radiation: human health
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, ionising radiation: human health Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,212 compared
land use
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, land use Agrees
2 outside the 1% band / 19,886 compared
Largest relative deviation: -62.5%
material resources: metals/minerals
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, material resources: metals/minerals Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,210 compared
ozone depletion
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,210 compared
particulate matter formation
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, particulate matter formation Agrees
28 outside the 1% band / 20,212 compared
Largest relative deviation: +140.56%
photochemical oxidant formation: human health
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, photochemical oxidant formation: human health Disagrees
2,117 outside the 1% band / 20,214 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,665.75%
water use
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, water use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,210 compared
IPCC 2021
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off · ipcc-2021
climate change: aircraft emissions
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: aircraft emissions Disagrees
20,210 outside the 1% band / 20,210 compared
Largest relative deviation: +3,838,009,936,637,737%
climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,210 compared
climate change: direct land use change
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: direct land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,076 compared
climate change: emissions from direct land use change
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: emissions from direct land use change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,258 compared
climate change: fossil
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: fossil Disagrees
14,825 outside the 1% band / 20,216 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,187,745.14%
climate change: fossil emissions (excl. aircraft emissions)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: fossil emissions (excl. aircraft emissions) Disagrees
14,854 outside the 1% band / 20,216 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,187,745.14%
climate change: removals from direct land use change
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
IPCC 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): nothing comparable: 26533 points at or below zero on one side
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP500)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP500) Disagrees
13,946 outside the 1% band / 20,170 compared
Largest relative deviation: +23,742.88%
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP20)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP20) Disagrees
12,973 outside the 1% band / 20,195 compared
Largest relative deviation: +8,087.52%
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP100)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global warming potential (GWP100) Disagrees
13,555 outside the 1% band / 20,192 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,611.05%
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP50)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP50) Disagrees
13,809 outside the 1% band / 20,190 compared
Largest relative deviation: +9,582.43%
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP100)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2) / global temperature change potential (GTP100) Disagrees
13,915 outside the 1% band / 20,184 compared
Largest relative deviation: +98,702.35%
climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: total (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs) Disagrees
13,537 outside the 1% band / 20,194 compared
Largest relative deviation: +8,969.95%
climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: biogenic (excl. CO2, incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,210 compared
climate change: fossil (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: fossil (excl. biogenic CO2, incl. SLCFs) Disagrees
14,828 outside the 1% band / 20,216 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,952,512.38%
climate change: direct land use change (incl. SLCFs)
ecoinvent 3.12 cut-off, climate change: direct land use change (incl. SLCFs) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 20,079 compared
Agribalyse
3.1.1
EF 3.1 adapted 1.0
Agribalyse 3.1.1 · ef31-adapted-1.0
Climate change
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Climate change Disagrees
838 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -56.58%
Ozone depletion
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Ozone depletion Disagrees
765 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -55.49%
Ionising radiation
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Ionising radiation Disagrees
206 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -59.08%
Photochemical ozone formation
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Photochemical ozone formation Disagrees
502 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -30.57%
Particulate matter
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Particulate matter Disagrees
220 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -30.49%
Human toxicity, non-cancer
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Human toxicity, non-cancer Disagrees
1,827 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -76.26%
Human toxicity, cancer
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Human toxicity, cancer Disagrees
1,616 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -47.25%
Acidification
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Acidification Disagrees
194 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -22.09%
Eutrophication, freshwater
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Eutrophication, freshwater Disagrees
676 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -65.6%
Eutrophication, marine
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Eutrophication, marine Disagrees
330 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -49.07%
Eutrophication, terrestrial
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Eutrophication, terrestrial Disagrees
205 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -28.8%
Land use
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Land use Disagrees
980 outside the 1% band / 2,468 compared
Largest relative deviation: -84.66%
Water use
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Water use Disagrees
941 outside the 1% band / 2,481 compared
Largest relative deviation: -92.15%
Resource use, fossils
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Resource use, fossils Disagrees
492 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -56.83%
Resource use, minerals and metals
Agribalyse 3.1.1, Resource use, minerals and metals Disagrees
1,292 outside the 1% band / 2,488 compared
Largest relative deviation: -68.97%
PEF
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-adapted-1.0: no category of the method answers to this name
Ecotoxicity, freshwater
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-adapted-1.0: no category of the method answers to this name
Agribalyse
3.2
EF 3.1 adapted 1.0
Agribalyse 3.2 · ef31-adapted-1.0
Climate change
Agribalyse 3.2, Climate change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Ozone depletion
Agribalyse 3.2, Ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Ionising radiation
Agribalyse 3.2, Ionising radiation Agrees
2 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Largest relative deviation: -1.12%
Photochemical ozone formation
Agribalyse 3.2, Photochemical ozone formation Agrees
1 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1.41%
Particulate matter
Agribalyse 3.2, Particulate matter Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Human toxicity, non-cancer
Agribalyse 3.2, Human toxicity, non-cancer Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,384 compared
Human toxicity, cancer
Agribalyse 3.2, Human toxicity, cancer Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Acidification
Agribalyse 3.2, Acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Eutrophication, freshwater
Agribalyse 3.2, Eutrophication, freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Eutrophication, marine
Agribalyse 3.2, Eutrophication, marine Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Eutrophication, terrestrial
Agribalyse 3.2, Eutrophication, terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Land use
Agribalyse 3.2, Land use Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,355 compared
Water use
Agribalyse 3.2, Water use Agrees
1 outside the 1% band / 2,388 compared
Largest relative deviation: -1.54%
Resource use, fossils
Agribalyse 3.2, Resource use, fossils Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
Resource use, minerals and metals
Agribalyse 3.2, Resource use, minerals and metals Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 2,389 compared
PEF
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-adapted-1.0: no category of the method answers to this name
Ecotoxicity, freshwater
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-adapted-1.0: no category of the method answers to this name
BAFU
2025 v1
IPCC 2021
BAFU 2025 v1 · ipcc-2021
GWP 100
BAFU 2025 v1, GWP 100 Disagrees
2,561 outside the 1% band / 11,556 compared
Largest relative deviation: +51,475.52%
Ecological Scarcity 2021
BAFU 2025 v1 · ecological-scarcity-2021
Water resources, evaporated
BAFU 2025 v1, Water resources, evaporated Disagrees
11,417 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Energy resources
BAFU 2025 v1, Energy resources Disagrees
4,025 outside the 1% band / 11,577 compared
Largest relative deviation: -91.81%
Mineral resources
BAFU 2025 v1, Mineral resources Disagrees
1,611 outside the 1% band / 11,551 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.47%
Land use
BAFU 2025 v1, Land use Disagrees
11,551 outside the 1% band / 11,552 compared
Largest relative deviation: +115,791,006.68%
Global warming
BAFU 2025 v1, Global warming Disagrees
2,658 outside the 1% band / 11,556 compared
Largest relative deviation: +36,089.95%
Ozone layer depletion
BAFU 2025 v1, Ozone layer depletion Disagrees
11,541 outside the 1% band / 11,543 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Main air pollutants and PM
BAFU 2025 v1, Main air pollutants and PM Disagrees
11,147 outside the 1% band / 11,561 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.3%
Carcinogenic substances into air
BAFU 2025 v1, Carcinogenic substances into air Disagrees
669 outside the 1% band / 11,548 compared
Largest relative deviation: -97.46%
Heavy metals into air
BAFU 2025 v1, Heavy metals into air Disagrees
778 outside the 1% band / 11,553 compared
Largest relative deviation: +55.07%
Water pollutants
BAFU 2025 v1, Water pollutants Disagrees
11,539 outside the 1% band / 11,554 compared
Largest relative deviation: +325,963.67%
POP into water
BAFU 2025 v1, POP into water Disagrees
10,698 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: +34,344.7%
Heavy metals into water
BAFU 2025 v1, Heavy metals into water Disagrees
11,542 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,422,432.24%
Pesticides into soil
BAFU 2025 v1, Pesticides into soil Disagrees
10,791 outside the 1% band / 11,540 compared
Largest relative deviation: +7,363,442.92%
Heavy metals into soil
BAFU 2025 v1, Heavy metals into soil Disagrees
6,051 outside the 1% band / 11,460 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,913,828.16%
Radioactive substances into air
BAFU 2025 v1, Radioactive substances into air Disagrees
8,684 outside the 1% band / 11,548 compared
Largest relative deviation: +14,791.48%
Radioactive substances into water
BAFU 2025 v1, Radioactive substances into water Agrees
456 outside the 1% band / 11,547 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,087.47%
Waste, non radioactive
BAFU 2025 v1, Waste, non radioactive Disagrees
10,725 outside the 1% band / 11,544 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.92%
Radioactive waste to deposit
BAFU 2025 v1, Radioactive waste to deposit Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,544 compared
Total
BAFU 2025 v1, Total Disagrees
10,834 outside the 1% band / 11,608 compared
Largest relative deviation: +360,917.78%
Noise
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
Biotic Resources
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
BAFU
2025 v2
IPCC 2021
BAFU 2025 v2 · ipcc-2021
GWP 100
BAFU 2025 v2, GWP 100 Disagrees
1,271 outside the 1% band / 11,556 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.42%
Ecological Scarcity 2021
BAFU 2025 v2 · ecological-scarcity-2021
Water resources, evaporated
BAFU 2025 v2, Water resources, evaporated Disagrees
11,417 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Energy resources
BAFU 2025 v2, Energy resources Disagrees
3,924 outside the 1% band / 11,577 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.27%
Mineral resources
BAFU 2025 v2, Mineral resources Disagrees
1,611 outside the 1% band / 11,551 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.47%
Land use
BAFU 2025 v2, Land use Disagrees
11,551 outside the 1% band / 11,552 compared
Largest relative deviation: +115,790,814.59%
Global warming
BAFU 2025 v2, Global warming Disagrees
2,659 outside the 1% band / 11,556 compared
Largest relative deviation: +36,089.75%
Ozone layer depletion
BAFU 2025 v2, Ozone layer depletion Disagrees
11,541 outside the 1% band / 11,543 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Main air pollutants and PM
BAFU 2025 v2, Main air pollutants and PM Disagrees
11,149 outside the 1% band / 11,561 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.3%
Carcinogenic substances into air
BAFU 2025 v2, Carcinogenic substances into air Disagrees
669 outside the 1% band / 11,548 compared
Largest relative deviation: -97.46%
Heavy metals into air
BAFU 2025 v2, Heavy metals into air Agrees
12 outside the 1% band / 11,553 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2.22%
Water pollutants
BAFU 2025 v2, Water pollutants Disagrees
11,539 outside the 1% band / 11,554 compared
Largest relative deviation: +325,963.67%
POP into water
BAFU 2025 v2, POP into water Disagrees
10,697 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: +34,344.87%
Heavy metals into water
BAFU 2025 v2, Heavy metals into water Disagrees
11,543 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,424,853.62%
Pesticides into soil
BAFU 2025 v2, Pesticides into soil Disagrees
10,791 outside the 1% band / 11,540 compared
Largest relative deviation: +7,363,442.74%
Heavy metals into soil
BAFU 2025 v2, Heavy metals into soil Disagrees
6,051 outside the 1% band / 11,460 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,913,828.04%
Radioactive substances into air
BAFU 2025 v2, Radioactive substances into air Disagrees
8,683 outside the 1% band / 11,548 compared
Largest relative deviation: +14,791.48%
Radioactive substances into water
BAFU 2025 v2, Radioactive substances into water Agrees
459 outside the 1% band / 11,547 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,087.47%
Waste, non radioactive
BAFU 2025 v2, Waste, non radioactive Disagrees
10,727 outside the 1% band / 11,546 compared
Largest relative deviation: +298,592,377,726,105.86%
Radioactive waste to deposit
BAFU 2025 v2, Radioactive waste to deposit Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,544 compared
Total
BAFU 2025 v2, Total Disagrees
10,815 outside the 1% band / 11,608 compared
Largest relative deviation: +360,917.78%
Noise
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
Biotic Resources
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
EF 3.1 adapted 1.05
BAFU 2025 v2 · ef31-1.05
Acidification
BAFU 2025 v2, Acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,555 compared
Climate change
BAFU 2025 v2, Climate change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,556 compared
Ecotoxicity freshwater
BAFU 2025 v2, Ecotoxicity freshwater Disagrees, for a known reason
11,542 outside the 1% band / 11,542 compared
Read the known reason
The method file's undivided category lists only 1109 substances, each named with a leading digit or punctuation mark and none of them a metal or a pesticide, while the published column is the whole indicator.
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Eutrophication freshwater
BAFU 2025 v2, Eutrophication freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,563 compared
Eutrophication marine
BAFU 2025 v2, Eutrophication marine Agrees
115 outside the 1% band / 11,563 compared
Largest relative deviation: +59.89%
Eutrophication terrestrial
BAFU 2025 v2, Eutrophication terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,556 compared
Human toxicity cancer
BAFU 2025 v2, Human toxicity cancer Disagrees
10,895 outside the 1% band / 11,515 compared
Largest relative deviation: +21,030.8%
Human toxicity non-cancer
BAFU 2025 v2, Human toxicity non-cancer Disagrees
10,932 outside the 1% band / 11,497 compared
Largest relative deviation: +39,447.8%
Land use
BAFU 2025 v2, Land use Disagrees
10,996 outside the 1% band / 11,301 compared
Largest relative deviation: +3,851,525,390,894,184%
Ozone depletion
BAFU 2025 v2, Ozone depletion Agrees
16 outside the 1% band / 11,545 compared
Largest relative deviation: +24.28%
Particulate matter
BAFU 2025 v2, Particulate matter Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,560 compared
Resource use fossils
BAFU 2025 v2, Resource use fossils Agrees
186 outside the 1% band / 11,548 compared
Largest relative deviation: +1,189.6%
Resource use minerals and metals
BAFU 2025 v2, Resource use minerals and metals Disagrees
5,704 outside the 1% band / 11,551 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,781,699.85%
Water use
BAFU 2025 v2, Water use Disagrees
10,769 outside the 1% band / 10,923 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Ionising radiation (human health)
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-1.05: no category of the method answers to this name
Photochemical ozone formation (human health)
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-1.05: no category of the method answers to this name
BAFU
2026 v1
IPCC 2021
BAFU 2026 v1 · ipcc-2021
GWP 100
BAFU 2026 v1, GWP 100 Disagrees
1,270 outside the 1% band / 11,657 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.42%
Ecological Scarcity 2021
BAFU 2026 v1 · ecological-scarcity-2021
Carcinogenic substances into air
BAFU 2026 v1, Carcinogenic substances into air Disagrees
678 outside the 1% band / 11,649 compared
Largest relative deviation: -97.46%
Energy resources
BAFU 2026 v1, Energy resources Disagrees
3,925 outside the 1% band / 11,675 compared
Largest relative deviation: -91.81%
Global warming
BAFU 2026 v1, Global warming Disagrees
2,796 outside the 1% band / 11,657 compared
Largest relative deviation: +36,516.49%
Heavy metals into air
BAFU 2026 v1, Heavy metals into air Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,650 compared
Heavy metals into soil
BAFU 2026 v1, Heavy metals into soil Disagrees
6,127 outside the 1% band / 11,561 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,914,908.34%
Heavy metals into water
BAFU 2026 v1, Heavy metals into water Disagrees
11,644 outside the 1% band / 11,647 compared
Largest relative deviation: +15,697,967,030,857,028%
Land use
BAFU 2026 v1, Land use Disagrees
11,652 outside the 1% band / 11,653 compared
Largest relative deviation: +115,864,199.3%
Main air pollutants and PM
BAFU 2026 v1, Main air pollutants and PM Disagrees
11,261 outside the 1% band / 11,662 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.31%
Mineral resources
BAFU 2026 v1, Mineral resources Disagrees
1,479 outside the 1% band / 11,649 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.47%
Ozone layer depletion
BAFU 2026 v1, Ozone layer depletion Disagrees
11,642 outside the 1% band / 11,644 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Pesticides into soil
BAFU 2026 v1, Pesticides into soil Disagrees
10,886 outside the 1% band / 11,641 compared
Largest relative deviation: +7,359,068.92%
POP into water
BAFU 2026 v1, POP into water Disagrees
10,797 outside the 1% band / 11,646 compared
Largest relative deviation: +34,099.33%
Radioactive substances into air
BAFU 2026 v1, Radioactive substances into air Disagrees
8,828 outside the 1% band / 11,649 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.9%
Radioactive substances into water
BAFU 2026 v1, Radioactive substances into water Agrees
522 outside the 1% band / 11,648 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.9%
Radioactive waste to deposit
BAFU 2026 v1, Radioactive waste to deposit Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,645 compared
Waste, non radioactive
BAFU 2026 v1, Waste, non radioactive Disagrees
10,822 outside the 1% band / 11,646 compared
Largest relative deviation: +95,855,570,743,486.7%
Water pollutants
BAFU 2026 v1, Water pollutants Disagrees
11,640 outside the 1% band / 11,655 compared
Largest relative deviation: +325,963.67%
Water resources, evaporated
BAFU 2026 v1, Water resources, evaporated Disagrees
11,518 outside the 1% band / 11,646 compared
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Total
BAFU 2026 v1, Total Disagrees
10,930 outside the 1% band / 11,706 compared
Largest relative deviation: +360,918.09%
Biotic Resources
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
Noise
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
Ecological Scarcity 2021 (ecoinvent-lcia-3.12): no category of the method answers to this name
EF 3.1 adapted 1.05
BAFU 2026 v1 · ef31-1.05
Acidification
BAFU 2026 v1, Acidification Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,656 compared
Climate change
BAFU 2026 v1, Climate change Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,657 compared
Climate change (biogenic)
BAFU 2026 v1, Climate change (biogenic) Agrees
3 outside the 1% band / 11,646 compared
Largest relative deviation: -3.05%
Climate change (fossil)
BAFU 2026 v1, Climate change (fossil) Agrees
386 outside the 1% band / 11,657 compared
Largest relative deviation: +11,073.14%
Ecotoxicity freshwater
BAFU 2026 v1, Ecotoxicity freshwater Disagrees, for a known reason
11,641 outside the 1% band / 11,641 compared
Read the known reason
The method file's undivided category lists only 1109 substances, each named with a leading digit or punctuation mark and none of them a metal or a pesticide, while the published column is the whole indicator.
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Ecotoxicity freshwater (inorganics)
BAFU 2026 v1, Ecotoxicity freshwater (inorganics) Disagrees, for a known reason
11,651 outside the 1% band / 11,656 compared
Read the known reason
The two published columns carry each other's labels: the method file files copper compounds under inorganics and glyphosate under organics, and held against the organics column the median ratio is 0.9246 instead of 36.5. The 7 percent that remain say the split itself differs, which no matching of names would recover.
Largest relative deviation: +177,088,241,829,711.35%
Ecotoxicity freshwater (organics)
BAFU 2026 v1, Ecotoxicity freshwater (organics) Disagrees, for a known reason
11,651 outside the 1% band / 11,654 compared
Read the known reason
The same swap seen from the other side: held against the inorganics column the median ratio is 0.9293 instead of 0.0361.
Largest relative deviation: -100%
Eutrophication freshwater
BAFU 2026 v1, Eutrophication freshwater Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,664 compared
Eutrophication marine
BAFU 2026 v1, Eutrophication marine Agrees
54 outside the 1% band / 11,664 compared
Largest relative deviation: +41.94%
Eutrophication terrestrial
BAFU 2026 v1, Eutrophication terrestrial Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,657 compared
Human toxicity cancer
BAFU 2026 v1, Human toxicity cancer Agrees
90 outside the 1% band / 11,623 compared
Largest relative deviation: -81.75%
Human toxicity cancer (inorganics)
BAFU 2026 v1, Human toxicity cancer (inorganics) Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,599 compared
Human toxicity cancer (organics)
BAFU 2026 v1, Human toxicity cancer (organics) Agrees
430 outside the 1% band / 11,651 compared
Largest relative deviation: -87.88%
Human toxicity non-cancer
BAFU 2026 v1, Human toxicity non-cancer Disagrees
8,478 outside the 1% band / 11,596 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.74%
Human toxicity non-cancer (inorganics) -
BAFU 2026 v1, Human toxicity non-cancer (inorganics) - Disagrees
7,911 outside the 1% band / 11,592 compared
Largest relative deviation: -98.78%
Human toxicity non-cancer (organics)
BAFU 2026 v1, Human toxicity non-cancer (organics) Disagrees
11,148 outside the 1% band / 11,656 compared
Largest relative deviation: -96.34%
Land use
BAFU 2026 v1, Land use Disagrees
9,433 outside the 1% band / 11,461 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.62%
Ozone depletion
BAFU 2026 v1, Ozone depletion Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,646 compared
Particulate matter
BAFU 2026 v1, Particulate matter Agrees
0 outside the 1% band / 11,661 compared
Resource use fossils
BAFU 2026 v1, Resource use fossils Agrees
20 outside the 1% band / 11,649 compared
Largest relative deviation: +14%
Resource use minerals and metals
BAFU 2026 v1, Resource use minerals and metals Disagrees
5,652 outside the 1% band / 11,648 compared
Largest relative deviation: +2,781,680.93%
Water use
BAFU 2026 v1, Water use Disagrees
5,181 outside the 1% band / 11,188 compared
Largest relative deviation: -99.91%
Climate change (land use)
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-1.05: no category of the method answers to this name
Ionising radiation (human health)
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-1.05: no category of the method answers to this name
Photochemical ozone formation (human health)
Recorded refusal
Read refusal reason
ef31-1.05: no category of the method answers to this name