← Reliability

EcoSpold 1 · Calculation comparison

BAFU 2025 v1, Radioactive waste to deposit

A comparison of published impact results with VoLCA calculations from the same source data and the publisher’s impact factors. Points on the diagonal agree.

This page shows engine v0.13.0, which is not the newest measured. Compare the engine versions, or see the current comparisons.

Engine version
volca 0.13.0 (8c0396c, v0.13.0, linux)
Measured on
Comparison measurements and reference
DatabaseBAFU 2025 v1
Source formatEcoSpold 1
Impact method collectionEcological Scarcity 2021
Impact categoryRadioactive waste to deposit
UnitUBP
Activities compared11,544
Median ratio (VoLCA / published)1.0000
Comparison band1%
Activities outside the band0
Share outside the band0%
VerdictAgrees: meets the agreement a release is held to
Points drawn1,924
Largest relative deviation+0.01%
Activity with largest deviationButene, mixed, at plant {RER}
Published referenceBAFU-2025 ecospold1.zip!BAFU-2025_LCIA Results.xlsx
BAFU 2025 v1, Radioactive waste to deposit
Each point is one activity: what BAFU 2025 v1 published for Radioactive waste to deposit (UBP), against what VoLCA computes from the same EcoSpold 1 source under the publisher's own Ecological Scarcity 2021 factors. The black line is equality and the grey band is 1%. 11,544 activities were compared; 1,924 from inside the band are drawn, evenly spaced over the published value. Where several fall on one spot, at most three markers are drawn there, since a fourth would not darken it. Median ratio 1.0000, 0.00% outside the band. This meets the agreement a release is held to: at most 5% of activities outside the band and a median ratio inside it.