← Reliability

EcoSpold 2 · Calculation comparison

ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable

A comparison of published impact results with VoLCA calculations from the same source data and the publisher’s impact factors. Points on the diagonal agree.

This page shows engine v0.13.0, which is not the newest measured. Compare the engine versions, or see the current comparisons.

Engine version
volca 0.13.0 (8c0396c, v0.13.0, linux)
Measured on
Comparison measurements and reference
Databaseecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off
Source formatEcoSpold 2
Impact method collectionEF v3.1
Impact categoryenergy resources: non-renewable
UnitMJ, net calorific value
Activities compared17,182
Median ratio (VoLCA / published)1.0000
Comparison band1%
Activities outside the band0
Share outside the band0%
VerdictAgrees: meets the agreement a release is held to
Points drawn1,910
Largest relative deviation0%
Activity with largest deviationmarket group for tap water
Published referenceecoinvent 3.9.1_cutoff_cumulative_lcia_xlsx.7z
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, energy resources: non-renewable
Each point is one activity: what ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off published for energy resources: non-renewable (MJ, net calorific value), against what VoLCA computes from the same EcoSpold 2 source under the publisher's own EF v3.1 factors. The black line is equality and the grey band is 1%. 17,182 activities were compared; 1,910 from inside the band are drawn, evenly spaced over the published value. Where several fall on one spot, at most three markers are drawn there, since a fourth would not darken it. Median ratio 1.0000, 0.00% outside the band. This meets the agreement a release is held to: at most 5% of activities outside the band and a median ratio inside it.