← Reliability

EcoSpold 1 · Calculation comparison

BAFU 2026 v1, Land use

A comparison of published impact results with VoLCA calculations from the same source data and the publisher’s impact factors. Points on the diagonal agree.

This page shows engine v0.13.0, which is not the newest measured. Compare the engine versions, or see the current comparisons.

Engine version
volca 0.13.0 (8c0396c, v0.13.0, linux)
Measured on
Comparison measurements and reference
DatabaseBAFU 2026 v1
Source formatEcoSpold 1
Impact method collectionEcological Scarcity 2021
Impact categoryLand use
UnitUBP
Activities compared11,653
Median ratio (VoLCA / published)7.6740
Comparison band1%
Activities outside the band11,652
Share outside the band99.99%
VerdictDisagrees: misses the agreement a release is held to
Points drawn2,118
Largest relative deviation+115,864,199.3%
Activity with largest deviationCork, raw, at forest road
Published referenceBAFU-2026 v1 LCIA Results.xlsx
BAFU 2026 v1, Land use
Each point is one activity: what BAFU 2026 v1 published for Land use (UBP), against what VoLCA computes from the same EcoSpold 1 source under the publisher's own Ecological Scarcity 2021 factors. The black line is equality and the grey band is 1%. 11,653 activities were compared; 11,652 fall outside the band, more than a picture can hold, so 1,943 of the 11,653 are drawn, evenly spaced over the published value whichever side of the band they fall, and the 175 of the 200 farthest from equality that this walk missed are added. Where several fall on one spot, at most three markers are drawn there, since a fourth would not darken it. Median ratio 7.6740, 99.99% outside the band. This misses the agreement a release is held to: at most 5% of activities outside the band and a median ratio inside it.