← Reliability

EcoSpold 1 · Calculation comparison

BAFU 2025 v2, Land use

A comparison of published impact results with VoLCA calculations from the same source data and the publisher’s impact factors. Points on the diagonal agree.

This page shows engine v0.13.0, which is not the newest measured. Compare the engine versions, or see the current comparisons.

Engine version
volca 0.13.0 (8c0396c, v0.13.0, linux)
Measured on
Comparison measurements and reference
DatabaseBAFU 2025 v2
Source formatEcoSpold 1
Impact method collectionEcological Scarcity 2021
Impact categoryLand use
UnitUBP
Activities compared11,552
Median ratio (VoLCA / published)7.7524
Comparison band1%
Activities outside the band11,551
Share outside the band99.99%
VerdictDisagrees: misses the agreement a release is held to
Points drawn2,093
Largest relative deviation+115,790,814.59%
Activity with largest deviationCork, raw, at forest road {PT}
Published referenceBAFU-2025 version2_LCIA Results.xlsx
BAFU 2025 v2, Land use
Each point is one activity: what BAFU 2025 v2 published for Land use (UBP), against what VoLCA computes from the same EcoSpold 1 source under the publisher's own Ecological Scarcity 2021 factors. The black line is equality and the grey band is 1%. 11,552 activities were compared; 11,551 fall outside the band, more than a picture can hold, so 1,926 of the 11,552 are drawn, evenly spaced over the published value whichever side of the band they fall, and the 167 of the 200 farthest from equality that this walk missed are added. Where several fall on one spot, at most three markers are drawn there, since a fourth would not darken it. Median ratio 7.7524, 99.99% outside the band. This misses the agreement a release is held to: at most 5% of activities outside the band and a median ratio inside it.