← Reliability

EcoSpold 2 · Calculation comparison

ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics

A comparison of published impact results with VoLCA calculations from the same source data and the publisher’s impact factors. Points on the diagonal agree.

This page shows engine v0.13.0, which is not the newest measured. Compare the engine versions, or see the current comparisons.

Engine version
volca 0.13.0 (8c0396c, v0.13.0, linux)
Measured on
Comparison measurements and reference
Databaseecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off
Source formatEcoSpold 2
Impact method collectionEF v3.1
Impact categoryhuman toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
UnitCTUh
Activities compared16,941
Median ratio (VoLCA / published)1.2028
Comparison band1%
Activities outside the band16,769
Share outside the band98.98%
VerdictDisagrees: misses the agreement a release is held to
Points drawn2,054
Largest relative deviation+18,952.5%
Activity with largest deviationsugar beet production
Published referenceecoinvent 3.9.1_cutoff_cumulative_lcia_xlsx.7z
ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off, human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics
Each point is one activity: what ecoinvent 3.9.1 cut-off published for human toxicity: carcinogenic, inorganics (CTUh), against what VoLCA computes from the same EcoSpold 2 source under the publisher's own EF v3.1 factors. The black line is equality and the grey band is 1%. 16,941 activities were compared; 16,769 fall outside the band, more than a picture can hold, so 1,883 of the 16,941 are drawn, evenly spaced over the published value whichever side of the band they fall, and the 171 of the 200 farthest from equality that this walk missed are added. Where several fall on one spot, at most three markers are drawn there, since a fourth would not darken it. Median ratio 1.2028, 98.98% outside the band. This misses the agreement a release is held to: at most 5% of activities outside the band and a median ratio inside it.